Mental and Behavioral Health Services Essay Example for Free

Mental and Behavioral Health Services Essay While the eventual fate of Mental and Behavioral Health Services keep on endeavoring through many endeavoring objectives to create nonstop practices, medicines, assessments, arrangements, and examination, headways are occurring to better the fate of this program and its effort to the individuals. Mental clutters are regular in the United States and universally. An expected 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and more established †around one out of four grown-ups †experience the ill effects of a diagnosable mental issue in a given year.1 When applied to the 2004 U.S. Registration private populace gauge for a long time 18 and more seasoned, this figure meant 57.7 million people.2 Even however mental clutters are normal in the populace, the principle heap of ailment is gathered in an a lot littler extent †around 6 percent, or 1 of every 17 †who are experiencing a genuine mental illness.1 what's more, mental scatters are the main source of incapacity in the U.S. also, C anada.3 Many individuals experience the ill effects of more than one mental issue at a given time. Around, 45 percent of those with any psychological issue meet the rules for being firmly identified with having at least 2 disorders.1 Awareness of having a turmoil is unprecedented in the U.S. Characterized FUTURE PROBLEMS Social wellbeing is a condition of mental/enthusiastic being and additionally decisions and activities that influence health. Substance misuse and abuse are one lot of conduct medical issues. Others incorporate, however are not constrained to, genuine mental pain, self destruction, and psychological sickness (4. SAMHSA, 2011). A large number of these issues are expansive and negatively affect people, their families and networks, and the more extensive society. Exploration permits us to show signs of improvement image of what the future resembles and what individuals should be proceeding to do and enhance. By investigating research, measurements anticipate that by 2020, mental and substance use issue will surpass every single physical infection as a significant reason for inability around the world. The yearly all out assessed cultural expense of substance maltreatment in the United States is $510.8 billion, with an expected 23.5 million Americans matured 12 and more established requiring treatment for substance use. Alongside that, consistently right around 5,000 individuals younger than 21 kick the bucket because of underage drinking and in excess of 34,000 Americans pass on consistently because of self destruction, very nearly one at regular intervals. Additionally, Half of all lifetime instances of mental and substance use issue start by age 14 and three-fourths by age 24â€in 2008, an expected 9.8 million grown-ups in the U.S. had a genuine psychological sickness. The wellbeing and wellbeing of people in America are risked and the superfluous expenses to society stream across Americas people group, schools, organizations, penitentiaries correctional facilities, and medicinal services conveyance frameworks. Numerous projects and administrations are cooperating to limit the effect of substance misuse and psychological maladjustments on America’s people group. Numerous experts have a profound understanding way to deal with social wellbeing and see anticipation as a feature of a general continuum of care. The Behavioral Health Continuum of Care Model encourages us perceive that there are different open doors for tending to social medical issues and clutters dependent on the Mental Health Intervention Spectrum, first presented in a 1994 Institute of Medicine report, the model incorporates these segments: ( It is essential to remember that mediations don't generally fit perfectly into some classification) * Promotion: These techniques are intended to make situations and conditions that help conduct wellbeing and the capacity of people to withstand difficulties. Advancement techniques likewise strengthen the whole continuum of social wellbeing administrations. * Prevention: Delivered before the beginning of a turmoil, these intercessions are expected to forestall or lessen the danger of building up a social medical issue, for example, underage liquor use, doctor prescribed medication abuse and misuse, and illegal medication use. * Treatment: These administrations are for individuals determined to have a substance use or other social wellbeing issue. * Maintenance: These administrations support individuals’ consistence with long haul treatment and aftercare. Two procedures for advancing the more significant and best openings in approaching mental and social wellbeing administrations incorporate giving training to arrive at people in general, and the anticipation and early mediation matters entwining with the Continuum model segments of treatment and upkeep. 7 The New Freedom Commission Report and Surgeon General’s Report both underlined the significance of changing open perspectives to take out the shame related with psychological sickness. Backers for the intellectually sick recognize disgrace and separation as significant obstructions to treatment. Disgrace keeps people from recognizing these conditions and dissolves open certainty that psychological issue are treatable. A majority of Americans accept that dysfunctional behaviors are much the same as some other ailment; in any case, 25 percent of overview respondents would not invite into their neighborhoods offices that treat or house individuals with psychological maladjustments, proposing that some degree of waiting shame persists.8 Sixty-one percent of Americans imagine that individuals with schizophrenia are probably going to be perilous to others9 in spite of exploration recommending that these people are seldom violent.10 So, the media assumes a huge job in molding how the young think and act from huge numbers of the messages kids get from TV, music, magazines, announcements, and the Internet use. Be that as it may, the media can be utilized to empower positive practices too. Four proof based correspondence and instruction avoidance approaches are through state funded training, social showcasing, media backing, and media education that can be utilized to â€Å"influence network standards, increment open mindfulness, and draw in network support for an assortment of anticipation issues† (SAMHSA). Government funded training is typically the most widely recognized technique and is a compelling method to demonstrate backing to the turn of events and achievement of projects and increment mindfulness about new or existing laws, publicizing a network based program, and fortify guidance instructed in schools or network based associations. Through social showcasing, professionals use publicizing methods of reasoning to change accepted practices and advance sound practices. Social showcasing efforts accomplish something beyond give data and attempts to persuade individuals to embrace another conduct by demonstrating them an advantage they will get in return.11 Social advertising efforts are being utilized in an assortment of social administrations and general wellbeing settings. Media promotion includes forming the manner in which social issues are examined in the media to assemble support for changes in open approach. By working straightforwardly with neighborhood papers, TV, and radio to change both the measure of inclusion the media give and the substance of that inclusion, media advocates would like to impact the manner in which individuals talk and consider a social or open policy12. Media education is a more up to date interchanges methodology planned for showing youngsters basic survey abilities. Media proficienc y programs show kids how to break down and comprehend the media messages they experience so they can all the more likely comprehend what they’re truly being approached to do and think. Derivations about a program viability depends on three things: (1) proportions of key builds, for example, chance and defensive factors or procedures, indications, issue, or different results, and program execution, devotion, or support; (2) an examination structure that figures out which members are being analyzed, how and when they will be surveyed, and what mediations they will get; and (3) measurable investigations that model how those given an intercession contrast on results contrasted and those in a correlation condition 19 Before, specialists and scientists saw substance misuse counteraction not the same as the anticipation of other conduct medical issues. Be that as it may, proof demonstrates that the populaces are altogether influenced by these covering issues just as variables that add to these issues. Hence, enhancements in a single zone for the most part impactsly affect the other. As indicated by the Substance Abuse and National Health Services Administration, not all individuals or populaces are at a similar danger of creating conduct medical issues. Numerous youngsters have more than one conduct issue. These clutters can communicate and add to the nearness of different issue. Other than broad exploration archiving solid relations between different issues, it’s not in every case clear what prompts what. Mental and physical wellbeing is additionally associated. Great emotional well-being regularly adds to great physical wellbeing. Similarly, the nearness of psychological well-being issue, including substance misuse and reliance, is frequently connected with physical wellbeing issue also (OConnell, 2009). One significant progression that has been as of late made is from The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, adding another hunt highlight to its National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) Web website. The element permits clients to recognize NREPP intercessions that have been assessed in similar viability research considers. Both the Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress have advocated extra interests in similar adequacy examination to upgrade open comprehension about which medicinal services mediations are best in various conditions and with various patients. The new NREPP highlight can give added data to States and networks looking to figure out which emotional wellness and substance misuse anticipation and treatment intercessions may best address their necessities. The Surgeon General’s takes note of that â€Å"effective interventi

Women and the American Revolution Essay -- Essays on American Revoluti

Ladies for the most part didn't battle in the transformation, and the customary status of Eighteenth Century ladies implied that they were not freely ready to take an interest completely in the discussions over the upset. Be that as it may, in their own circle, and now and again out of it, lady partook completely in the transformation in all the manners in which that their status and specially permitted. As the open discussion over the Townshend Acts developed progressively destructive, ladies indicated their help for the reason for opportunity by taking part in certain "feminine" interests. A typical practice was to freely boycott English imports, particularly tea, from their homes. Making custom made, that is, the repetitive making of hand crafted texture from turning and weaving their own material, was another open method of demonstrating support for the reason for opportunity. During the American Revolution, numerous ladies were legitimately influenced by the battling since their dad or siblings or spouse or children were off battling. This implied the ladies regularly needed to assume full liability for the family ranch or business. An ever increasing number of ladies became "deputy husbands" and spoke to the family in lawful or business exchanges. In certain cases, as the battling approached their properties, ladies even needed to wage war to protect their individual or property when the event requested. A few ladies in Groton, Massachussetts, put on their spouses' apparel, outfitted themselves with black powder guns and pitchforks and guarded the Nashua River Bridge. They caught a notoriou...

What is Price Skimming And How does it Work In the Market

What is Price Skimming And How does it Work In the Market What Is Price Skimming Summary What Is Price SkimmingHow it Works?Price Skimming AdvantagesPerceived qualityCost recoveryHigh profitabilityBenefits of Vertical supply chainPrice Skimming DisadvantagesDeterrenceSales volume limitationIneffective long-term strategyConsumer loyaltyFoundation of Price SkimmingPrice Skimming LimitsAt the institutional levelAt market levelAt brand levelAt retailer levelAt the customer levelConclusion Price skimming is a pricing strategy of a product in which the highest starting price charges by a firm that consumers will pay and formerly lowers it with time. As the first customers demand, it is satisfied, and competition in the market enters, the firm to attract another lowers the price and population more price-sensitive segment. The strategy of skimming gets its name as skimming customer segments or successive cream layers after a while; prices are lowered. The “skimming” name originates from the idea of exploring all potential buyers such as a stack â€" those on the top are eager to pay the maximum, even though those by the bottom wish to pay the minimum. How it Works? It is frequently used when a product of a new type enters the market. The aim is to collect as much revenue as likely when the demand of consumers is high, as well as competition in the market hasn’t entered. When those goals were met, the creator of the original product can lower the product prices to attract buyers who are more cost-conscious through remaining competitive on the way to any lower-cost copier items in the market entered. Firms frequently use skimming for the cost of development recovery. Price Skimming is a beneficial strategy in the given settings: Adequate potential customers are willing to buy a high priced product.The high price of a product doesn’t attract competitors.The price lowering ought to have only a slight effect on rising sales volume as well as decreasing unit costs.The high price is taken as a high-quality sign. Price Skimming Advantages Perceived quality It aids build a high-quality product perception and image. Cost recovery To a firm, it helps in recovering its development costs quickly. High profitability For the company, it creates a high-profit margin. Benefits of Vertical supply chain It assists distributors in earning a higher percentage. The price increase on a product of $500 is far more significant than on a $5 product. Price Skimming Disadvantages Deterrence If the firm incapable of validating its high price, customers may not be eager to buy the product. Sales volume limitation A firm might not be capable of economies of scale use if a skim price creates inadequate sales. Ineffective long-term strategy It isn’t a feasible long-term strategy of pricing as competitors will ultimately enter the market with the pressure of rival pricing and products. Consumer loyalty If a product that costs 1,000 dollars at launch has a follow-on $200 price of in some months, innovators primary adopters may feel exploited. So, if the firm has a price skimming history, consumers may wait for some months before buying the product. Foundation of Price Skimming Price skimming used for profit maximization when a new service or product deployed. So, the pricing strategy is effective in an advanced product in which the firm is the 1st to enter the market. In this strategy, the aim is to produce the maximum profit in the small-time period possible instead of maximum sales. It enables a firm to recover quickly. Its sunk costs formerly increased pricing pressure and competition. Price Skimming Limits It is fundamentally limited in 5 diverse ways: At the institutional level It is a complex price discrimination form. Price discrimination in maximum countries is illegal as well as price skimming could consequently be a risky strategy to adopt for companies. At market level Skimming frequently gives rise to high margins. Meanwhile, high margins are very attractive; competitors will desire to enter into the market with a similar or a highly comparable product, creating the skimming effect disappear slowly. At brand level If it turns out to be too clear for customers that a firm is using a skimming strategy of pricing for any specified product, they will whether wait for the product price to drop before buying or be dissatisfied if they have already bought this product at an excessive price. At retailer level Skimming infers that selling a product at a lower price, beginning at a high price and slowly decreasing it further further. At the customer level Price Skimming is related to price discrimination after a while, and so indicates that a product will be dispersed more gradually. Conclusion Price skimming includes fixing a high price before other competitors enter the market. This is frequently used for a new product launch that faces no or little competition â€" typically because of certain technological features. It also has some advantages and disadvantages. We offer Price skimming assignment help to our clients. We have experts to provide assignment help to students. 247 services are available to all of the high quality at nominal pricing. Even provide solutions that are plagiarized-free and within a time limit.

Using 4 Block (4 Corners) Template in Math

Second Amendment and Firearms Laws - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2617 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/03/20 Category Law Essay Level High school Topics: Gun Control Essay Second Amendment Essay Did you like this example? The 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution is commonly known to ordinary civilians, the Right to Bear Arms. However, the United States Supreme Court has officially interpreted that the Second Amendment gives an individual the right to possess a weapon unrelated to military service for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense. There are many civilians in our nation who believe that the Second Amendment means the possession of firearms, and due to the mass shootings that have happened and are still happening around the country, many of the people have decided that it is in the countrys best interest to have the civilian right to bear arms revoked, protesting the right to firearms. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Second Amendment and Firearms Laws" essay for you Create order From the 1930s to the 2000s, the federal government implemented different major federal firearms laws; regardless of these numerous regulations and laws, gun control activists believe that the civilian right to bear arms should be controlled due to the recent rise in firearm-related injuries and deaths, while gun rights activists argue that gun control laws infringe upon peoples rights and citizens should have the right to use and own firearms for lawful and recreation reasons, and correspondingly, the federal and state government has upheld the regulations or the Second Amendment in different court cases. The federal government of the United States has passed several major firearms laws with different purposes to regulate gun control for both citizens and officers of the law without violating the Second Amendment. Since the first firearm legislation passed in 1927, the federal government has enacted several crucial legislations and regulations about firearms that have stayed within the boundaries of the Second Amendment, and to keep the public safe: the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, ruling from United States v. Miller, and the Gun Control Act of 1968. Each legislation passed had an effect on firearms users and the rest of the public. The National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) introduced a tax on the manufacturing and transporting of firearms, as well as a specific employment tax on the people and entities involved in the manufacturing, importing/exporting, and dealing in the NFA specified firearms. However, as stated by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the National Firearm Act of 1934 had an intrinsic purpose to abridge, if not completely ban, transactions of NFA defined firearms. Additionally, the NFA imposed a requirement on all people transporting or transferring NFA defined firearms, including all possessors of unregistered firearms, to register them with the Secretary of the Treasury. This legislation affected the public in which if a person went to register an unregistered firearm, the State could use information acquired from the Department of Treasury and prosecute the individual involved; Supreme Court ruled this legislation unconstitutional in United States v. Haynes, with the Hayne s decision essentially nullifying the NFA. Another gun control milestone was the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, which is still in effect today. The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 (FFA) as opposed to the NFA mandates that firearm manufacturers and dealers acquire a federal firearms license (FFL). This in turn has allowed federal firearms licensed gun dealers and manufacturers to keep customer records, and defined groups of people who werent allowed to purchase guns. In United States v. Miller the Supreme Court ruled that Congress could regulate interstate selling of a sawed off shotgun through the NFA, and that such a weapon has reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia. The Gun Control Act of 1968 was and currently is a federal law that regulates interstate and foreign commerce in firearms. The Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed following the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy and currently imposes strict licensin g and regulation of the firearms industry. GCA also currently establishes new groups of firearms offenses and crimes and bans the sale of firearms or other weapons to convicted felons and certain other people. Title II of the GCA amended the National Firearms Act to cure the constitutional flaw uncovered in the Haynes decision. The Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986, Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, and the NICS Improvement Act of 2008 are all incorporated acts in the GCA. Each incorporated act gave safety to both gun owners and the general public. These different major gun control legislations provided by control and safety to the general public, while not violating the gun owners Second Amendment rights of the Constitution. The debate around gun control and the peoples constitutional right to guns is a hot, controversial topic, and many gun control activists believe that gun violence is a gargantuan problem in the United States, and that the recent rise of gun violence that results in gun-related injuries and death is a call for stricter laws. How much has gun violence resulting in injury and death increased? The number of different acts of gun violence that resulted in injury and death, for example, in the year 2015 have risen, and gun control proponents use the statistics taken on the reported incidents to support their cause. For example, a shooting is one form of gun violence that results in gun-related injury and death; in the year of 2015 alone, according to PBS.org, Oldham (2016) stated that the total number of shootings tallied was 372 incidents (para. 2). Additionally, according to the New York Times, in the year 2016, Hauser (2017) stated that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention rep orted that the firearm mortality rate in the United States had risen up to about 12 per 100,000 people (para. 1). Gun homicide, another form of gun violence resulting in gun-related deaths, is also a reason why gun control advocates want regulations on the purchase and use of firearms. Gun homicides do not get as much media attention as shootings, but on average, 34 people in America are murdered, as stated by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Shootings and gun-related homicides are just two of many different forms of gun violence that result in injury and death. In conjunction with these two forms of gun violence, gun control advocacy organizations argue that the major firearms laws and regulations passed by Congress should be maintained to curb the number of deaths caused by firearms. Gun control advocates argue that the allowing of civilian access to assault weapons leads to mass casualties. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, also known as the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Act, is one legislation that gun control advocacy organizations are arguing to bring back, as the act expired in 2004. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban banned the civilian use of automatic and semi-automatic weapons and large capacity magazines. Organizations such as a Coalition to Stop Gun Violence have persistently advocated the renewal of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban, stating that assault weapons are designed to maximize lethality, and that they are intended to kill as many humans as possible as quickly as possible. Gun control activists often argue that the laws and regulations currently in place are too lenient in regards to the accessibility of firearms, and that because of the dangers guns pose, criminals or people who are not fit to handle such a weapon should be thoroughly have their background checked. Correspondingly, firearms control advocates argue that licensed dealers who sell to criminals, or bad apple firearms dealers, and lack of background checks also contributes to the rise in gun-related injury and death. These advocates believe that stricter laws on these licensed dealers and background checks are needed because people with nefarious purposes have and can access them without much difficulty. As stated by Everytown for Gun Safety, thousands of guns are available for sale from unlicensed online dealers without, despite the federal law that mandates licensed gun dealers conduct background checks for all guns sales. Similarly, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Violence believes that b ad apple gun dealers are responsible for most of the guns used in crimes that result in death all across the United States. Gun rights advocates argue the very opposite. Gun rights advocates have argued that the gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety. Additionally, gun rights activist also argue that by implementing gun control laws, particularly those that restrict and/or ban assault weapons, infringe upon the right to own guns for recreation such as hunting or sport. Advocates of the Second Amendment also argue that gun control laws will not stop criminals from using firearms as a weapon, as it the the criminal who uses the gun to hurt, not the gun in and of itself. Gun rights advocates and others who support the Second Amendment relative to other arms have acknowledged that there should be certain laws that restrict guns, but in a way that does not violate the peoples constitutional right to bear arms, firearms and other weapons included. Since the formation of the United States Constitution, gun rights advocacy organizations argue that the citizens of the United States have earned the constitutional right to use/carry firearms or any other form of arms to protect themselves in self-defense against criminals, as shown in different Supreme Court cases. One landmark Supreme Court case that involved the Second Amendment is District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008. This cases ruling set a precedent for gun rights advocates because the ruling struck down provisions of a D.C. law that prohibited handgun possession making the carrying of unregistered firearms and prohibiting the registration of handguns a crime. This District of Columbia law also required that no person was allowed to carry an unlicensed handgun and residents to keep all owned firearms unloaded and/or bound by a trigger lock or similar device (District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008). The Supreme Courts ruling that the District of Columbias law was unconstitution al was a huge step for gun rights advocates and their views on civilian gun ownership. The United States Supreme Court has had many landmark cases in which the Court either upheld a firearms regulation/law or upheld the Second Amendment for the people. In addition to the case of District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008 and Haynes v. United States in 1968, there have been several recent cases involving the Second Amendment, both at the federal and state level. McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois was a major court case that took place in 2010 after the Heller ruling in 2008. In this case, petitioners filed a federal suit against the city of Chicago stating that the citys handgun possession ban left the citizens defenseless against criminals, and that the ban was unconstitutional. Originally, the Court rejected the petitioners argument that the ban was unconstitutional, referring back to the Seventh Circuits Heller ruling which refrained from interpreting whether or not the Second Amendment applied to the States; however, this decision was reversed and the case remanded, as four Justices dissented as they found no constitutional protection against state intrusion (McDonald v. Chicago, 2010). This case upheld the Second Amendment of the Constitution and was considered a win for gun rights advocates. Another very recent case involving the Second Amendment is Voisine v. United States in 2016. Supreme Court, in an attempt to close a dangerous loophole in firearms regulations, extended the federal ban of firearms possession by a convicted felon to a person convicted of a misdemeanor under the law: federal, state, and/or tribal (Voisine v. United States, 2016). This ruling by the Supreme Court made gun purchases by citizens with a misdemeanor conviction from firearms licensed gun dealers prohibited; it was also a win for gun control advocates lobbying for tighter, harsher gun control laws. Caetano v. Massachusetts in 2016 is also a case involving the Second Amendment. In this case, Jaime Caetano, a woman convicted for carrying a stun gun for self-defense, had her conviction overturned because the weapon was a form of a lawful weapon possessed at home, thus falling under the protection of the Second Amendment, regardless of the weapons relation to military use (Caetano v. Massachusett s, 2016). While this court case was not directly related to firearms, such as handguns, rifles, and shotguns, the arm in question fell under the protection of the Second Amendment. I stand today as a supporter and advocate of the Second Amendment. I understand that the issue about gun rights and gun control is a sensitive and controversial topic. In light of all of the violence with guns surrounding society today, I reasonably see why people are so afraid about firearms and why people believe that gun control laws should be stricter. From shootings to suicides to gun homicides, people are now living in constant fear that the area where they live or work could be a potential target for a shooting, or people they love could take their own lives with guns bought online. I also understand that guns cant be stopped completely from being sold illegally. Gun control and gun rights activists are reasonably fighting for their cause. There is no denying that violence through the use of firearms is incredibly dangerous. Gun control activists do have reasons to pursue stricter gun laws, and gun rights advocates have their reasons why they believe that stricter gun laws infringe on their right to own firearms whether for lawful or recreational purposes. The question is, what gun laws that provide safety for the general public, but also do not violate or infringe upon our Constitutions Second Amendment can be passed? From history to present times, the federal government has passed critical gun regulations and laws, and upheld convictions and the Second Amendment rights; subsequently leading to differently held beliefs on the two sides of gun rights and gun control. References Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. Assault weapons. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.csgv.org/issues/assault-weapon/ Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Changing the gun industry. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bradycampaign.org/our-work/changing-the-gun-industry Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Key gun violence statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.bradycampaign.org/key-gun-violence-statistics Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. National firearms act. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Gun control act. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/gun-control-act Caetano v. Massachusetts, 577 U. S. ___ (2016) (per curiam) Dimaggio, C., Avraham, J., Berry, C., Bukur, M., Scd, J. F., Klein, M., . . . Frangos, S. (2018, 09). Changes in US mass shooting deaths associated with the 1994-2004 Federal Assault Weapon Ban [Abstract]. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000002060 District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U. S. 570 (2008) Everytown for Gun Safety. Online Gun Sales. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://everytownresearch.org/issue/online-gun-sales/ Gray, S. (2018, February 22). A timeline of gun control laws in the U.S. Time. Retrieved from https://time.com/5169210/us-gun-control-laws-history-timeline/ Gun Control ProCon.org. Top pro con arguments. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://gun-control.procon.org/ Hauser, C. (2017, November 04). Gun death rate rose again in 2016, C.D.C. says. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/04/us/gun-death-rates.html Haynes v. United States, 390 U. S. 85 (1968) McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U. S. 742 (2010) Oldham, A. (2016, January 01). 2015: The year of mass shootings. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/2015-the-year-of-mass-shootings United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174 (1939) United States v. Miller. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/307/174 U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice Information Services Division. (2016). Crime in the United States 2016. Retrieved from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-2016/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-4.xls Library of Congress. United States: Gun ownership and the Supreme Court. (2012, May 10). Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/law/help/second-amendment.php Voisine v. United States, 579 U. S. ___ (2016)

Reality TV Shows Free Essays

Nowadays almost everyone has an opportunity to watch television daily. Whether it is news, documentaries, films or reality TV shows. I am almost certain that the last type mentioned is the most popular among all age groups. We will write a custom essay sample on Reality TV Shows or any similar topic only for you Order Now Reality shows can be entertaining for its viewers and even participants. You can enjoy artist’s music while you watch almost every step of his daily routine. Also it helps new artists to become better known after these kind of projects. It is a good way for TV channels to make money too. Viewers usually have to vote by their phone just to decide which singer, actor, dancer or other kind of artist is better. Never the less TV companies make even more money from the commercials during that show. Although the Reality TV shows are very popular amongst all age groups it can be dangerous for the younger audience. It can harm relationships with others just because they like or vote for other artist. It can also give children the wrong idea of real life. And children can get into trouble with their parents for staying up late, etc. Some people think that these shows are not harmful at, some think that they should be broadcast after midnight, others think that they should be banned at all. To be honest, I totally agree with them. Some shows should be banned just because they are not worth the air time. These shows are all about the money and they don’t teach people anything useful at all. To sum up, I have to say that I am not the biggest fan of reality tv, to be honest I use the TV in my room just as a light in the morning, so I don’t have to get out of the bed for a couple of minutes, and in my point of view they should be banned or at least broadcast after the midnight when the younger audience could not be harmed. How to cite Reality TV Shows, Papers

Bad Blood by Blood on the Dance Floor free essay sample

BOTDF’s career started out shakily. Dahvie Vanity had come out of another group that disbanded due to the other members’ not being able to tour like Vanity. BOTDF officially got its start in 20007, with the first full album, Let’s Start A Riot! That was also when the Slash Gash Terror Crew was born. The fan following is massive, even though BOTDF gets a bad rap. The criticism goes deep. Davey Boy, a staff member of Sputnikmusic, said in a review: â€Å" While Jayy Von Monroes vocals are occasionally tolerable, Dahvie Vanitys are in desperate need of auto-tune especially throughout verses where he approaches rapping and spoken-word. Seriously, you just have to listen to his delivery of Every 14.2 minutes, someone in the United States dies by suicide at the beginning of You Are the Heart to understand how awful Vanitys voice is. † Perwell Fowler from Bring on Mixed Reviews said â€Å" Why review something that looks like an easy target you ask? It’ s because there has got to be a better way to get the youth to know they aren’t alone in this world and to be confident enough to be free from bullying and depression, than listening to someone with a purple studded jacket and tiger whisker face paint. We will write a custom essay sample on Bad Blood by Blood on the Dance Floor or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If you are a fan reading this, do yourself a favor and pick up a less offensive choice.† In 2013, the album, Bad Blood, was released to expectant fans. It features the singles I Refuse to Sink and Crucifed By Your Lies, the latter being Vanity’s outcry against sex.ual assult charges that were dropped. But the album’s quality is outstanding compared to the previous albums. Vanity’s vocals are smoother, his screams less screechy. Now, Jayy Von Monroe’s vocals are even better. His voice is deeper and utilized to their full extent. The ever-present se.xual messages have disappeared almost completely. Only one song is somewhat suggestive. The rest of the songs are inspiring in a way. Bad Blood is by far Blood On The Dance Floor’s best work yet.